loam.
Close & consolidation software

One correct combined picture — from books that don't agree.

Multi-entity close and consolidation for groups of 2–50 entities. Built for structures that are multi-entity by mandate — a propco and an opco, a holding company over sixteen property LLCs, a sponsor carrying one entity per asset.

Start an evaluation See how it works

US GAAP and IFRS as a configuration switch. Single currency.

The problem

Your “consolidated” report is a roll-up.

Nothing eliminated. Intercompany still sitting in every line. Revenue counted twice where one entity sold to another. The combined number in the board deck is wrong — and everyone quietly knows it.


What a roll-up structurally leaves in

Both sides of every sale

Intercompany revenue and the matching cost of sales, counted once in each entity — group revenue overstated by the full intragroup amount.

Both sides of every balance

The seller's receivable and the buyer's payable, on two balance sheets — assets and liabilities each grossed up by the same figure.

Profit on assets still held

Margin recognized on stock or property that never left the group, sitting in earnings and in the carrying value of what's still on hand.

Why it stays broken

Nothing is built for the middle.

Spreadsheets

Two entities already need eliminating, and a spreadsheet will do it. What it will not do is show its work — how the figure was derived, who checked it, or what happens the month the person who built the tab is out.

Enterprise suites

Scoped and priced for groups far larger than yours — often six-figure implementations to solve a problem you can describe in one sentence.

Everything else

Assumes one clean ERP. Real groups run NetSuite at the top, QuickBooks per property, and a spreadsheet for the entity nobody wants to migrate.

loam is built for mixed-source groups specifically — a trial-balance file from every entity, whatever system it came from, matched and eliminated on one consistent basis.

What it does

Trial balances in. A close you can defend out.

Load

A trial-balance file from every entity, whatever system it came from.

Match

Paired by counterparty; variances surfaced, aged where aging is provided.

Eliminate

Intercompany rent, fees and balances — plus profit on assets and stock transferred between affiliates. Deferred tax only where a group is a separate-return filer; pass-through structures book none.

Attribute

Split between the parent and noncontrolling interests on the configured ownership percentages.

Tie out

Line by line against a known-good reference.

Hand over

Income statement, balance sheet, cash flow, changes in equity, flux versus prior — plus the Excel workpaper.

loam eliminates intercompany wherever it occurs — rent between a propco and an opco, management fees across a holding structure, supplies from an affiliate, goods from a plant to a distributor.

loam's Eliminations tab for a 21-entity property portfolio: entry E1 eliminating intercompany sales against cost of goods sold, balanced, and citing ASC 810-10-45-1
Every entry balances, and carries its citation on the face — not a black-box adjustment.
Proof, not promise

We don't ask you to trust it. We tie it.

Every consolidated line, matched against a known-good reference — your own system of record, or an independently prepared consolidation — and shown with its variance.

354 accounts tied on a 25-entity property portfolio
0 breaks in that tie-out — to the penny
loam's Tie-out tab: seventeen consolidated lines matched against a known-good reference, each variance 0.00, zero breaks
The tie-out, line by line, with the variance shown rather than absorbed.

Tied out to what, if my current consolidation is the thing I don't trust?

To your existing combined report — and that's the point. Tying to it doesn't validate it. It produces a line-by-line reconciliation between what you have and what is correct, where every difference is explained by a cited elimination. No baseline at all? Prior-period audited financials or the lender package work too — and where there's genuinely nothing to tie to, loam says so on the face of the statement rather than skipping the check quietly.

The doctrine

Even a statement that ties is not automatically right.

Two entities disagree by a thousand dollars. Most tools bury it in a plug and show you a clean close. loam refuses.

It shows the difference, names what it needs, and will not call the close reconciled until you make the call. Every assumption it cannot independently validate is disclosed on the face of the statement — never absorbed into a number.

loam's close summary showing a status of Review with five open items named individually, including an intercompany residual of 3,500 that could not be eliminated
This close is not marked done. Five open items, each named, each pointing at the tab it lives on — including 3,500 of intercompany that could not be eliminated.
Audit-ready by construction

Every entry cites the standard.

Not a black-box adjustment. A journal — balanced, dated, and carrying its citation on the face.

Dr = Cr on every entry

No entry posts unless it balances. The check is the engine's, not a reviewer's.

ASC 810 / IFRS 10 cited

The applicable standard travels with the entry, under either basis.

Drill any figure to its support

Every number opens to the detail behind it, down to the driver rows.

The journal exports with its support intact — ready for auditor review.

The deliverable

A workpaper somebody signs.

The full statement package on screen — and one Excel file carrying the combining worksheet, the elimination journal, the tie-out, and every caveat.

One sheet, end to end

Entity → combined → eliminations → consolidated.

Caveats travel with the file

Review items don't stay on a screen somebody forgot to check.

No re-keying

Once the mapping is set, next month is refresh and review.

loam's Workpaper tab: the Excel deliverable containing the combining worksheet, elimination journal, tie-out and caveats
The Excel workpaper, generated from the same engine run as the screen.
Evaluation

One month, on your own books.

A pilot close against your trial balances — your entities, your chart of accounts, your intercompany. Not a sandbox, not sample data.

Consolidated statement package

Tied out line by line.

Elimination journal

Every entry cited to the standard.

Excel workpaper

Review-ready.

Every open item named

Nothing plugged.

[email protected]

Send one month of trial balances and the ownership percentages. That's enough to start.


What happens at 51 entities?

2–50 is the segment loam is built for, not a technical ceiling. If you're above it, say so and we'll tell you honestly whether it's a fit.